Earlier
this week in class, we discussed the heartbreaking conclusion of The White Boy Shuffle by Paul Beatty. By
the end of the novel, my favorite characters had already committed suicide or
were preparing to do so. The novel provides an unconventional look at suicide
as a way to beat the system set up by white society. This idea interested me,
and after the class discussion I could not stop thinking about how Gunnar
transitioned from the happy skater at the beginning of the novel to the man who
somehow found himself the leader of a mass suicide.
The ending
of the novel was a shock even though the mass suicide was disclosed in the
prologue of the novel. A major factor in this was the success of the characters
Beatty develops. Nicholas Scoby and Gunnar Kaufman gifted both athletically and
intellectually. Scoby is incredibly talented at basketball, he cannot miss a
shot even if he tries. Gunnar has an innate skill for basketball. As a seventh
grader, he dunks the ball in his first time playing to the astonishment of all
the other players. Scoby’s intelligence is apparent in the first passage we are
introduced to him when we are informed that “Scoby was a straight-A student” (66).
Gunnar has a knack for coming up with impressive commentaries on society on the
spot. At a Shakespearean soliloquy finals that Scoby and Gunnar attend, Gunnar criticizes
the way the other contestants and judges stereotyped and belittled their talent
before they started their presentation. When Gunnar attends the predominantly white
high school and plays a basketball game against Scoby’s team he ridicules the rest
of his school’s attitude towards him. He recognizes that he and the other black
players on the team are accepted because of their basketball skill so he wears white
gloves and powders his face to expose the minstrel show dynamic. Although
readers are aware of the racial prejudice the characters face, we are still hopeful
that this skill is enough to secure them a bright future. The fact that even
their intellectual and athletic abilities are not enough to prevent their
suicides makes the end that much more crushing.
Gunnar’s improvisation
is a sign not only of his intelligence, but also an indication of his general
nature. Gunnar meets racial prejudice head on with clever retorts. He always
fights back and refuses to let racial prejudice pass unnoticed. The first time
we see this falter is when he sees the results of the Rodney King trial. Gunnar
has no response, all he can do is sink into the couch and let the crushing reality
of extent of racism in America weigh down on him. Gunnar’s response to the
Rodney King trial sets the dynamic for the rest of the novel. Before this
section, Gunnar definitely recognizes how he is discriminated against, but he always
puts a humorous spin on it. After the Rodney King trial, we get a much bleaker picture
of the racism Gunnar has faced. Although Gunnar never faces the racism as
extreme as the protagonists in Native Son
and Invisible Man, he still has to sustain
extremely dehumanizing experiences. One example of this is when Psycho Loco and
Gunnar have a conversation about the instances they have been stopped by the
police.
On the
final page of the novel, Beatty voices one of his criticisms of American
society when Gunnar explains his rationale for suicide to Psycho Loco. Gunnar
explains that fighting back is just playing into society’s twisted role for
black people in America. There is no fight to be had, “me (Gunnar) and America
aren’t even enemies” (226). The imagery of Gunnar as “the horse pulling the
stagecoach” (226) is very powerful in that it shows how American society can
just control him. Gunnar realizes that the best way to fight back is to take
control over his life and not give America the satisfaction. This concept is
illustrated earlier in the novel when Gunnar talks to Scoby about suicide. Scoby
asks, “‘To kill yourself you don’t need a permit do you?’” to which Gunnar
responds “‘Naw, I don’t think so’” (204). This quite cynical interaction shows
the mentality that suicide is the only path free from control.
I think
that it is worth briefly differentiating between their suicides and when Gunnar’s
father commits suicide. Gunnar’s father lived a life as “the horse pulling the
stagecoach”. He is a part of the corrupt LAPD and does not stand up for his
race. Rather, he laughs along with the jokes and lets them use his face as a
basis for identifying criminals. When he commits suicide he dies by “choking on
the firing pin” (226). He intends to shoot himself, but instead chokes on the
firing pin which symbolizes his lack of ownership over his life.
By no means
am I saying that Beatty encourages his readers to think that Gunnar’s choice is
the correct solution. Beatty uses suicide to shock the reader and force the
reader to see how the severity of Gunnar’s predicament. Throughout the novel exaggerates
scenarios for stronger reactions from the readers. For instance, the overnight
move to hillside and the nature of some of the characters stand out. Not only are
the suicides there to demonstrate the extreme impacts of racism, Beatty uses
the suicide to point out American society’s perverse means of satisfaction. This
is demonstrated when the smirk on the reporter’s face tells Gunnar the results
of the Rodney King trial before he even hears it. Suicide as the only means to
win shines a light on the corruption of American society.